Between Binaries: Liminality and the Dynamics of Alterity
Fri, 5/1—Sat, 5/2 · 211 Dickinson Hall
Center for Collaborative History
In ancient and modern societies, we can trace a complex dynamic created by wide-ranging interaction within the spectrum of human diversity. It triggers closures in which social boundaries are drawn between ‘us’ and ‘them’. These divisions enable an unequal distribution of power and resources. Yet in the long run, they rarely fulfill the expectations of all those who feel entitled to a share in the privileges conferred by the mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion put into place. The boundaries therefore come under pressure, are contested and/or subverted. Depending on the societal distribution of wealth and power they can get more rigid or more flexible. Based on recent research, we aim for a better understanding of the strategies of distinction formulated and employed by individuals and groups. How and when do social categorisations become more or less salient, and how does their varying salience impact their use, meaning and history? We focus on spaces between more or less well-delineated entities in which individuals and groups may find themselves, driven by the own ambitions and/or ill fates. The people in-between have to mobilize all their resources to face the challenge. They may become cultural brokers, ambitious converts, a badly-treated workforce or destitute outsiders. It is no surprise that people who in the past produced the most interesting written accounts on their own societies would understand themselves as in-betweeners. But does this self-understanding correspond to assessments by historians? For which social spaces and individual fates does ‘in-between binaries’ provide a productive category? This is the main question we would like to pursue. We aim at a differentiated understanding of the fates and options of those who were caught in the middle, in between constructed alterities. Observing how people occupied places in-between binaries, and how boundaries were maintained by enforcing binary oppositions can provide us with a window into the histories of categorial infrastructures in different cultures, societies and periods.
Guest Speakers:
Kate Cooper, Royal Holloway, London
Maximilian Diesenberger, Institute for Medieval Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences
Stefan Esders, Free University Berlin
Francesca Fiaschetti, Excellence Cluster Eurasian Transformations, Austrian Academy of Sciences
Boris Fonarkov, Excellence Cluster Eurasian Transformations, Austrian Academy of Sciences
Mariia Golovina, Excellence Cluster Eurasian Transformations, Austrian Academy of Sciences
Katharina Heyden, Bern University
Conrad Leyser, Oxford University
Salvatore Liccardo, Excellence Cluster Eurasian Transformations, Austrian Academy of Sciences
Sierra Lomuto, Rowan University
Naoise MacSweeney, University of Vienna
Nina Mirnig, University of Vienna
Walter Pohl, University of Vienna
Pavlína Rychterová, Davis Center, Princeton University / Institute for Medieval Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences
Cord Whitaker, Wellesley College
Organized by Helmut Reimitz
- Center for Collaborative History
- Program in Contemporary European Politics and Society
- Humanities Council
- Stanley J. Seeger ’52 Center for Hellenic Studies
- Program in Medieval Studies
- Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies